It is currently Tue Oct 17, 2017 3:49 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Re: Worldwide Moonbat Watch.

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:31 am 
Offline
Lord of Flangebury-Under-Scythe
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 6683
spoonman wrote:
Maybe I'm being picky but I always thought the term "moonbat" referred to people or groups that held delusional/irrational/deranged views on the (far) left of the political spectrum, whereas those on the (far) right equivalent were "wingnuts"?


Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist Leninist) fit the bill for me. Pro North Korea, pro-Assad, pro-fucking Stalin. As do any other left groups that embrace repression in the name of anti-imperialism.

_________________
MY COMMENTS ARE FROM THE HORSES MOUTH AND ARE ALL FACTS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:06 am 
mojojojo has some style.

I bet you he/she could cook a good gumbo.... :D

Meanwhile .... watching moonbats....


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:34 am 
Offline
Lord of Flangebury-Under-Scythe
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 6683
Thanks?

_________________
MY COMMENTS ARE FROM THE HORSES MOUTH AND ARE ALL FACTS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:56 pm
Posts: 9566
Location: Gunchester
Speaking of oddballs, I see ex-BNP racist and all-round head-the-ball Claire Khaw's joined the Tories. Bit surprised they've let her in - even UKIP would probably turn their noses up.

Image

Quote:
Meet Claire Khaw.

She was thrown out of the BNP …… for being too extreme.

Apparently even the BNP couldn’t stomach Claire’s views – for example euthanasia for disabled babies:

“If I had a severely disabled child or knew I was about to have one I wouldn’t impose it on the taxpayer and expect other people to pay for all the expensive equipment that it needs …“

So which political party was extreme enough to accommodate Claire and her mentalist views?

Well, Claire’s just announced she’s joined the Conservative Party – describing it as “like coming home”.

No – this isn’t one of my more tasteless satires. Although whenever I come across right-wing mentalists like her I can’t help thinking they must be joking.

But unfortunately – for the Conservative Party - Claire’s real enough.

I expect we’re going to be seeing some frantic spinning from Cameron’s spin doctors over this.

A round of applause for Claire folks.

What an act.


http://tompride.wordpress.com/2012/11/2 ... ive-party/

_________________
Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 14855
new puritan wrote:
Speaking of oddballs, I see ex-BNP racist and all-round head-the-ball Claire Khaw's joined the Tories. Bit surprised they've let her in - even UKIP would probably turn their noses up.

Image

Quote:
Meet Claire Khaw.

She was thrown out of the BNP …… for being too extreme.

Apparently even the BNP couldn’t stomach Claire’s views – for example euthanasia for disabled babies:

“If I had a severely disabled child or knew I was about to have one I wouldn’t impose it on the taxpayer and expect other people to pay for all the expensive equipment that it needs …“

So which political party was extreme enough to accommodate Claire and her mentalist views?

Well, Claire’s just announced she’s joined the Conservative Party – describing it as “like coming home”.

No – this isn’t one of my more tasteless satires. Although whenever I come across right-wing mentalists like her I can’t help thinking they must be joking.

But unfortunately – for the Conservative Party - Claire’s real enough.

I expect we’re going to be seeing some frantic spinning from Cameron’s spin doctors over this.

A round of applause for Claire folks.

What an act.


http://tompride.wordpress.com/2012/11/2 ... ive-party/



Contrary to the Blogger I'm pretty sure that's not an Kalaskikov (Which has a fair wad of plumbing atop the barrel).

Her left arm is obscuring most of the detail, and I don't know the height of the lady.
But my best guess is that it's the short (para) version of the Belgian Fusil Automatique Leger (and she's about as tall as Jimmie Krankie).

My cock and conscience remain unconflicted.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:30 pm
Posts: 6630
Location: Underpants
Bones McCoy wrote:
Contrary to the Blogger I'm pretty sure that's not an Kalaskikov (Which has a fair wad of plumbing atop the barrel).

Her left arm is obscuring most of the detail, and I don't know the height of the lady.
But my best guess is that it's the short (para) version of the Belgian Fusil Automatique Leger (and she's about as tall as Jimmie Krankie).

My cock and conscience remain unconflicted.


Nah, the FAL is low barrelled, that thing's mid. I'd say it was Italian, maybe something by Beretta.

Mine, too.

_________________
¡Es no mi puta culpa!


Last edited by Carlos The Badger on Thu Feb 31, 2021 18:60 am, edited 666 times in total.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 20811
Location: Up my own arse.
Should I be concerned at how much you chaps know about guns?

_________________
"The opportunity to serve our country. That is all we ask." John Smith, Leader of the Labour Party, 10 May 1994.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:30 pm
Posts: 6630
Location: Underpants
Not really. Much.

_________________
¡Es no mi puta culpa!


Last edited by Carlos The Badger on Thu Feb 31, 2021 18:60 am, edited 666 times in total.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:45 pm 
Offline
Lord of Flangebury-Under-Scythe
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 6683
Do the Tories actually know who she is? Can't anyone join a mainstream party without giving them their political history?

_________________
MY COMMENTS ARE FROM THE HORSES MOUTH AND ARE ALL FACTS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:52 pm
Posts: 8569
Location: Dirty XBerg 36
The Jobbik Party in Hungary are a right nasty bunch of shitheads.

Quote:
People of Jewish heritage are a "security risk" and should be registered on a nationwide list, according to right-wing extremist Hungarian politician Márton Gyöngyösi. His comments, made in the country's parliament, have sparked widespread outrage. But the government was slow to distance itself.


Der Spiegel (in English) has the story;

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/far-right-rhetoric-in-hungary-reaches-new-dimension-a-869826.html

These racists don't do self-awareness, do they?)

_________________
Selbstgerechte Fotze


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 14855
Abernathy wrote:
Should I be concerned at how much you chaps know about guns?


We're probably just both obsessive tech-heads who love to know how things work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 14855
Kreuzberger wrote:
The Jobbik Party in Hungary are a right nasty bunch of shitheads.

Quote:
People of Jewish heritage are a "security risk" and should be registered on a nationwide list, according to right-wing extremist Hungarian politician Márton Gyöngyösi. His comments, made in the country's parliament, have sparked widespread outrage. But the government was slow to distance itself.


Der Spiegel (in English) has the story;

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/far-right-rhetoric-in-hungary-reaches-new-dimension-a-869826.html

These racists don't do self-awareness, do they?)



Sounds a bit like "Jobbie", which will do little for their credibility if they try to forge links with Braveheart fans in these parts.
I move that we nickname then the floaters (along the lines of the Big Yin's turd based sketch).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 20811
Location: Up my own arse.
Bones McCoy wrote:
Abernathy wrote:
Should I be concerned at how much you chaps know about guns?


We're probably just both obsessive tech-heads who love to know how things work.


Yeah, errrr..... right.

_________________
"The opportunity to serve our country. That is all we ask." John Smith, Leader of the Labour Party, 10 May 1994.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 3339
Abernathy wrote:
Bones McCoy wrote:
Abernathy wrote:
Should I be concerned at how much you chaps know about guns?


We're probably just both obsessive tech-heads who love to know how things work.


Yeah, errrr..... right.


They can't be that obsessed - neither spotted that it's "Kalashnikov" not "Kalaskikov" ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:56 pm
Posts: 9566
Location: Gunchester
Japan's government would appear to be totally fucking crackers.

Quote:
Japan’s public diplomacy hovers between the ludicrous and the sinister. In recent months, the country has specialised in foreign policy gaffes that seem designed to give maximum offence to its Asian neighbours while causing maximum embarrassment to its western allies.

Last week provided another example. Japan unveiled the largest naval vessel it has built since the second world war. The ship is nominally a destroyer – but it is an aircraft carrier in all but name. Beefing up the Japanese navy is arguably a legitimate response to China’s arms build-up. But, at a time of rising tensions in Asian seas, Japan should tread carefully. So what genius decided to call this new ship “Izumo” – the same name as a Japanese warship that took part in the invasion of China in the 1930s.

China was quick to charge Japan with deliberate provocation. Such an accusation would be easier to brush aside if the naming of the Izumo was an isolated incident. But just a few days earlier Taro Aso, Japan’s deputy prime minister, was caught suggesting that the Nazis might provide a suitable model for efforts to revise Japan’s pacifist constitution. “We should proceed quietly,” Mr Aso mused. “One day people realised that the Weimar constitution had changed into the Nazi constitution. No one had noticed. Why don’t we learn from that approach?” The unsurprising outcry that greeted these remarks forced an official spokesman to issue a clarification: “The Abe administration does not perceive Nazi Germany in a positive light.”

Just a couple of months earlier, it was Shinzo Abe who committed an offensive gaffe. The Japanese prime minister was photographed giving a thumbs-up from the cockpit of a trainer-jet with the number 731 painted prominently on the side. But 731 was the number of a unit of the Japanese imperial army, notorious for carrying out biological and chemical experiments on humans. I was in South Korea at the time the photo appeared in May – and almost every Korean I spoke to was convinced that it was a deliberate provocation. At the time I dismissed that view as paranoia. But now I am not quite so sure. Since then, Park Geun-hye, South Korea’s new president, has pointedly paid a state visit to Beijing before visiting Tokyo – breaking with a precedent set by her four predecessors.


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c4d9e34c-033a ... z2bmpdQtGk

_________________
Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Fatal: ./cache/ is NOT writable.